Comparing Stock Image Libraries: Shutterstock vs. Adobe Stock Reviewed

FULL VIDEO REVIEW :

When comparing Shutterstock and Adobe Stock, both stock image libraries offer extensive collections and unique features. Here’s a breakdown of their key aspects:

1. Image Quality and Variety

• Shutterstock: Offers over 300 million images, including photos, vectors, and illustrations. The quality is generally high, catering to diverse industries.
• Adobe Stock: Features around 200 million assets, including high-quality images, videos, templates, and 3D assets. It integrates well with Adobe Creative Cloud, making it convenient for users of Adobe software.

2. Pricing and Plans

• Shutterstock: Offers various subscription plans and on-demand packs. Prices vary based on image quantity and license type. Generally, it’s more flexible for occasional users.
• Adobe Stock: Provides subscription plans tied to Adobe Creative Cloud, making it a great option for existing Adobe users. Pricing can be competitive, especially with the inclusion of assets for Creative Cloud apps.

3. Licensing

• Shutterstock: Offers standard and enhanced licenses. The enhanced license allows for broader usage, which can be beneficial for commercial projects.
• Adobe Stock: Has a simple licensing model, primarily offering standard licenses that cover most uses. Extended licenses are also available for more specific needs.

4. User Experience

• Shutterstock: The interface is user-friendly, with advanced search options that include filtering by orientation, color, and more. Users can create lightboxes for organizing favorite images.
• Adobe Stock: Seamlessly integrates with Adobe products, allowing users to search for and import assets directly into applications like Photoshop and Illustrator, which is a major advantage for Adobe users.

5. Contribution and Community

• Shutterstock: A large contributor base, allowing for a wide range of styles and subjects. Contributors can earn royalties based on downloads, encouraging a diverse selection.
• Adobe Stock: Contributors can upload their work directly from Adobe applications, fostering a community of creatives. Adobe’s established brand also lends credibility to contributor work.

6. Special Features

• Shutterstock: Offers a range of additional features, including 3D models, video content, and music tracks. The editorial content is particularly strong for news-related imagery.
• Adobe Stock: Known for its high-quality editorial images and unique assets like templates and videos. The integration with Adobe Sensei (AI) enhances search capabilities and user experience.

7. Customer Support

• Shutterstock: Provides a help center and customer support via chat and email, though response times can vary.
• Adobe Stock: Benefits from Adobe's customer support infrastructure, offering comprehensive help resources and community forums.

Conclusion

Both Shutterstock and Adobe Stock have their strengths. Shutterstock excels in variety and flexibility, making it suitable for users needing a broad range of assets. Adobe Stock, on the other hand, is ideal for those who are deeply integrated into the Adobe ecosystem, offering seamless access to assets within Creative Cloud. Your choice may ultimately depend on your specific needs, usage patterns, and whether you already utilize Adobe products.