When comparing the Garmin Forerunner 165 and COROS Pace 3, both are excellent choices for running and fitness tracking, but they cater to slightly different user needs and preferences. Here's a detailed breakdown of their features, pros and cons, and value for money.

Overview

• Garmin Forerunner 165: A mid-range running watch with advanced training features, solid GPS performance, and health tracking capabilities. It's designed for runners looking for a well-rounded device that offers both smartwatch functions and fitness metrics.
• COROS Pace 3: Known for its lightweight design and exceptional battery life, the Pace 3 is geared towards serious athletes and outdoor enthusiasts. It offers robust performance tracking and features that cater specifically to runners and cyclists.

Key Features Comparison

1. GPS and Tracking

• Garmin Forerunner 165: Offers multi-band GPS for improved accuracy, especially in challenging environments. It includes features like pace tracking, elevation gain, and VO2 max estimates.
• COROS Pace 3: Also features multi-band GPS, providing accurate tracking for various outdoor activities. It includes unique features like a breadcrumb trail for navigation.

1. Battery Life

• Garmin Forerunner 165: Provides about 20 hours in GPS mode, making it suitable for long runs but not as long-lasting as some competitors.
• COROS Pace 3: Exceptional battery life, offering up to 30 hours in GPS mode, which is beneficial for ultra-marathons or extended outdoor activities.

1. User Interface and App Integration

• Garmin Forerunner 165: Features a user-friendly interface with customizable data screens. The Garmin Connect app offers extensive analysis tools and community features.
• COROS Pace 3: Simple interface and robust app features. The COROS app provides insights and challenges but lacks some of the social features found in Garmin's ecosystem.

1. Health and Fitness Features

• Garmin Forerunner 165: Includes heart rate monitoring, training load analysis, recovery time suggestions, and advanced metrics like training status.
• COROS Pace 3: Offers heart rate monitoring, sleep tracking, and activity tracking. While it has many fitness metrics, it may not be as comprehensive as Garmin's offerings.

Pros and Cons

• Garmin Forerunner 165:
• Pros: Excellent GPS accuracy, comprehensive fitness metrics, great integration with the Garmin ecosystem.
• Cons: Slightly bulkier design, battery life could be better for ultra-events.
• COROS Pace 3:
• Pros: Superior battery life, lightweight design, excellent GPS tracking for outdoor activities.
• Cons: Fewer social features and app integrations compared to Garmin, simpler metrics analysis.

Conclusion

Both the Garmin Forerunner 165 and COROS Pace 3 offer great value for their respective features. The Forerunner 165 shines with its advanced metrics and community features, making it suitable for runners who want a well-rounded fitness experience. In contrast, the COROS Pace 3 excels in battery life and lightweight design, appealing to athletes who prioritize endurance and simplicity.