Canon EF vs RF - 50mm F/1.2 | My Thoughts + Example Photos – Portrait Photoshoot Behind the Scenes
4 months ago
23
Canon EF vs RF - 50mm F/1.2 | My Thoughts + Example Photos – Portrait Photoshoot Behind the Scenes
FULL VIDEO REVIEW:
Features
Canon EF 50mm F/1.2:
Mount Compatibility: Designed for Canon's DSLR cameras with an EF mount but can be adapted for mirrorless cameras.
Wide Aperture: Offers an impressive f/1.2 aperture, delivering a stunning shallow depth of field and excellent low-light performance.
Manual and Autofocus Options: Smooth manual focus ring with reliable autofocus, but slightly slower than RF.
Build Quality: Sturdy construction, built to withstand challenging conditions, though slightly heavier than the RF version.
Canon RF 50mm F/1.2:
Newer Mount Design: Specifically built for Canon's RF mirrorless cameras, which offers improved optical quality and autofocus speed.
Wider Aperture Control: The f/1.2 aperture in RF lenses is optimized for fast, accurate focusing even at a shallow depth of field.
Enhanced Autofocus: The RF mount allows faster, more accurate autofocus and improved subject tracking, ideal for portrait shoots.
Compact and Lightweight: With a sleeker design, the RF lens is more compact and lighter, making it easier to handle in portrait sessions.
Reviews
Canon EF 50mm F/1.2: Users have praised the Canon EF 50mm F/1.2 for its beautiful bokeh, creamy background blur, and sharp center focus. Portrait photographers appreciate the smoothness in capturing natural skin tones and detail. However, some have noted that the EF version can feel heavy, and the autofocus may lag slightly compared to newer RF models.
Canon RF 50mm F/1.2: The Canon RF 50mm F/1.2 is celebrated for its fast, precise autofocus and enhanced optical performance. The RF lens consistently produces sharp images from center to edge, with a particular emphasis on high contrast and vivid colors. The lens is also noted for being compact and well-balanced, though some photographers feel the price is higher compared to the EF version.
Pros
Canon EF 50mm F/1.2:
Exceptional bokeh and soft background blur.
Great low-light capabilities due to f/1.2 aperture.
Durable and robust, built to last.
Adaptable for RF mounts with an adapter.
Canon RF 50mm F/1.2:
Outstanding autofocus speed and accuracy, especially in low light.
Compact and lightweight, easy to handle for long sessions.
Superior edge-to-edge sharpness.
Optimized for Canon RF mirrorless systems with full electronic compatibility.
Cons
Canon EF 50mm F/1.2:
Slower autofocus, especially noticeable in dynamic shooting.
Heavier and bulkier than the RF version.
Needs an adapter for RF mirrorless bodies.
Canon RF 50mm F/1.2:
Higher price point compared to the EF version.
Only compatible with Canon’s RF mirrorless bodies.
Limited availability in some regions.
Benefits
Canon EF 50mm F/1.2 is ideal for photographers looking to achieve exceptional bokeh and low-light capabilities, especially those with existing EF-mount DSLR setups or who are transitioning to RF with an adapter.
Canon RF 50mm F/1.2 is perfect for photographers who need fast autofocus, improved sharpness, and compatibility with Canon’s RF mirrorless cameras. The lens’ compact design also makes it well-suited for portrait photographers looking for high performance with ease of handling.
Conclusion
In the Canon EF vs RF - 50mm F/1.2 comparison, each lens offers unique benefits tailored to different needs:
The Canon EF 50mm F/1.2 delivers rich bokeh and adaptability for DSLR users, and it’s a great choice for traditionalists who prefer a robust design and are okay with a slightly slower focus.
The Canon RF 50mm F/1.2 shines for mirrorless photographers who prioritize speed and optical enhancements. Its design and performance make it a premium choice for portrait photographers invested in the Canon RF ecosystem.
Consider your shooting style and camera setup—if you’re using an RF mirrorless body and want top-notch performance, the RF version is worth the investment; otherwise, the EF 50mm F/1.2 remains a strong, adaptable choice.
User Comments